Today’s Mains Practice
Latest question ऊपर है; सभी पुराने प्रश्न नीचे filter और pagination के साथ उपलब्ध हैं.
Commercial coal mining reforms have improved transparency, investment and domestic supply, but India’s long-term energy security cannot be separated from environmental safeguards, federal revenue sharing and the clean-energy transition. Discuss.
वाणिज्यिक कोयला खनन सुधारों ने पारदर्शिता, निवेश और घरेलू आपूर्ति को बढ़ाया है, किंतु भारत की दीर्घकालिक ऊर्जा सुरक्षा को पर्यावरणीय सुरक्षा उपायों, संघीय राजस्व साझेदारी और स्वच्छ ऊर्जा संक्रमण से अलग करके नहीं देखा जा सकता। चर्चा कीजिए।
View Model Answer
Introduction
Coal continues to support electricity generation and several core industries, making domestic supply relevant to near-term energy security. India’s commercial coal-mine auction regime, launched in June 2020, sought to replace discretionary allocation with transparent online bidding, wider private participation and market-oriented production. Yet energy security is not simply a question of extracting more coal; it also concerns affordability, ecological sustainability, local legitimacy and transition risk.
Main Answer
Why the Reforms Matter
- Transparent allocation: Competitive online auctions reduce discretion and improve the credibility of resource allocation.
- Investment and competition: Removal of end-use restrictions and permission for 100 per cent foreign direct investment through the automatic route widen participation.
- Domestic supply: Higher captive and commercial production can moderate import dependence and support power, steel and other industries.
- Federal and local revenue: States receive revenue share and royalty, while statutory contributions to the District Mineral Foundation and the National Mineral Exploration Trust continue.
- Employment and regional activity: Mine development can generate logistics, services and local employment in coal-bearing regions.
Limits of a Coal-Only Security Strategy
- Environmental costs: Mining affects forests, water, air quality and biodiversity; weak compliance can transfer national energy benefits into local ecological losses.
- Community concerns: Land acquisition, rehabilitation, health impacts and benefit-sharing influence the social legitimacy of projects.
- Carbon lock-in: Long-lived coal assets can become inconsistent with a progressively lower-carbon electricity system and create stranded-asset risk.
- Fiscal dependence: Coal-bearing states and districts may become dependent on mining revenues, complicating future diversification.
- Worker transition: Automation, mine closure and clean-energy shifts require advance skilling and social-security planning.
Way Forward
Commercial mining should operate within strict environmental and forest clearances, transparent water-use norms, scientific mine-closure plans and outcome-based use of District Mineral Foundation funds. Methane management, land reclamation, real-time compliance monitoring and community participation must accompany production. At the same time, coal-dependent regions need renewable-energy investment, storage, manufacturing, skills and alternative employment so that the transition is planned rather than disruptive.
Suggested flowchart: Transparent Auction → Domestic Supply → State & Local Revenue → Environmental Safeguards → Diversification & Just Transition.
Conclusion
India’s energy security must evolve from a narrow focus on “more coal” to a broader goal of reliable, affordable and progressively cleaner energy. Commercial mining can serve the transition period only when transparency, ecological limits, federal fairness and a credible just-transition strategy move together.
Examples / Data points: Commercial auctions launched June 2020; no end-use restriction; 100% FDI automatic route; revenue share additional to royalty, DMF and NMET contributions.
Dimensions to cover
- Transparent auctions; private investment; import dependence; federal revenue; DMF and local development; environment; community rights; carbon lock-in; worker transition.
Answer-writing tip: Begin with the 2020 commercial-auction reform. Balance supply, investment and state revenue gains against environmental externalities, community rights, carbon lock-in and transition risks. End with a just-transition framework.
मॉडल उत्तर
15 अंक | 250 शब्द | 12 मिनट
प्रस्तावना
वाणिज्यिक कोयला नीलामी पारदर्शी और प्रतिस्पर्धी संसाधन आवंटन तथा व्यापक निवेश को बढ़ावा देती है, किंतु ऊर्जा सुरक्षा में पर्यावरणीय और संक्रमण लागतों को भी शामिल करना आवश्यक है।
मुख्य उत्तर
1. पारदर्शी नीलामी; निजी निवेश; आयात निर्भरता; संघीय राजस्व; जिला खनिज प्रतिष्ठान और स्थानीय विकास; पर्यावरण; समुदाय अधिकार; कार्बन निर्भरता; श्रमिक संक्रमण।
उदाहरण / आँकड़े
जून 2020 में वाणिज्यिक नीलामी की शुरुआत; अंतिम उपयोग प्रतिबंध समाप्त; स्वचालित मार्ग से पूर्ण प्रत्यक्ष विदेशी निवेश; राजस्व हिस्सेदारी रॉयल्टी तथा जिला खनिज प्रतिष्ठान और राष्ट्रीय खनिज अन...
निष्कर्ष
वाणिज्यिक खनन निकट अवधि की ऊर्जा विश्वसनीयता में योगदान दे, लेकिन साथ ही कोयला-निर्भर क्षेत्रों को विविधीकृत, स्वच्छ और सामाजिक रूप से न्यायपूर्ण ऊर्जा भविष्य के लिए योजनाबद्ध ढंग से तैया?...
उत्तर-लेखन सुझाव
2020 की वाणिज्यिक नीलामी व्यवस्था से शुरुआत करें। घरेलू आपूर्ति, निवेश और राज्य राजस्व के लाभों को पर्यावरणीय बाह्य प्रभाव, समुदाय के अधिकार, कार्बन निर्भरता और संक्रमण जोखिमों के साथ संतुलि?...
All Mains Questions
No question disappears when a new one is published.